INDIA PERSPECTIVE

New Delhi turns the affair into a hammer-blow argument for 'sovereign AI,' convinced the episode confirms a risk it had already flagged. While the direct impact is nil — no Indian firm relied heavily on Fable 5 or Mythos 5 — Indian tech leaders see a 'wake-up call.' Jaspreet Bindra, founder of 'AI and Beyond,' sums up the mood: as organizations shift to AI-led operations and deploy solutions built on foreign-developed large language models, an abrupt suspension of service 'could seriously hurt business operations.' The dominant angle is therefore less outrage than planning: India reads the block as a real-world demonstration of what would happen to any country dependent on a single supplier subject to Washington's orders. The business press recalls the context that makes the episode credible: Anthropic, already placed on a supply-chain blacklist after refusing to lend its models to domestic surveillance and autonomous weapons, is now hit on the export front — proof that the line between commercial interest and security imperative can shift overnight. For a country that claims an autonomous tech trajectory and funds its own digital infrastructure, this double signal — dangerous dependence and US regulatory unpredictability — feeds directly into the case for a sovereign AI stack, from chips to models, that Indian think tanks have been urging for months.