EXPLORE THIS STORY
META AND YOUTUBE FOUND GUILTY OF ADDICTING MINORS: SILICON VALLEY'S BIG TOBACCO MOMENT
AI-generated content — Analyses are produced by artificial intelligence from press articles. They may contain errors or biases. Learn more
Whataboutism: the verdict validates Russian banning of American platforms — censorship disguised as protection
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
Russian coverage perfectly illustrates state media's structural whataboutism. The Kremlin narrative instrumentalizes the American verdict: if even US courts recognize that Silicon Valley platforms harm children, Russia was right to ban them. Meta has been classified as an 'extremist organization' since 2022. YouTube remains accessible but under growing pressure.
The context is telling: in February 2026, Russia began restricting Telegram access — planning a full block for April 1, 2026. Human Rights Watch denounces a 'digital iron curtain.' The Carnegie Endowment analyzes that Telegram restrictions are not motivated by child protection but by political control: Telegram was the last space of relatively free communication in Russia.
The national replacement is MAX, a messenger created by VK (VKontakte) designated as 'national multifunctional messenger' in July 2025. The American verdict serves as a convenient pretext for an information control policy that has nothing to do with child protection.
Systematic whataboutism: American verdict used to justify Russian censorship
Total absence of critical voices in state media on digital restrictions
Deliberate confusion between minor protection and Kremlin information control
Discover how another country covers this same story.