EXPLORE THIS STORY
UNITED KINGDOM PERSPECTIVE
SUDAN ENTERS ITS FOURTH YEAR OF WAR: 150,000 DEAD, DRONES, FAMINE, AND THE WORLD'S SILENCE
DOMINANT ANGLE
London confronts international silence with raw testimony and damning figures
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
ANALYSIS
London tackles the Sudan file head-on for the Berlin conference. The Guardian quotes Denise Brown, UN official in Sudan, calling the international response "bloody unacceptable" — unusually blunt language for a UN official. She points out: "Every conversation about Sudan is about the humanitarian crisis. Why not focus on a solution to end the war?" The journal reveals that nearly half of community kitchens, a vital lifeline for millions, have closed in six months. The BBC publishes the extraordinary account of journalist Mohamed Suleiman, trapped in El-Fasher for nearly the entire war. When he finally reactivated his phone in Port Sudan in January, three years of messages awaited him: friends who thought he was dead, deceased colleagues. "It was like Judgment Day on Earth," he says of El-Fasher's fall. The Guardian notes that only 16% of needed humanitarian funding has been provided and that the Iran crisis "continues to dominate diplomatic channels."
KEY POINTS
- UN Sudan official calls international response "bloody unacceptable"
- Journalist trapped 3 years in El-Fasher finds 3 years of messages upon reactivating his phone
- 16% of needed humanitarian funding provided, the rest absorbed by Iran crisis
COGNITIVE BIASES IDENTIFIED
Anglo-Saxon humanitarian framing: victims as objects of compassion rather than political subjects
Culpabilization of "the world" without naming the responsible parties (UAE, Saudi Arabia)
Mobilization of the Berlin conference to present British leadership
SOURCES (2)
BBCCenter
RELIABLE
Does this analysis seem accurate?
SHARE
