RISING TENSIONS BETWEEN IRAN AND THE UNITED STATES: THREAT TO THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ

GERMANY

STATE

2 sources

Techno-economic scepticism toward American military escalation

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

ARGENTINA

1 sources

Critical neutrality with emphasis on energy consequences and Iranian voice

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

AUSTRALIA

2 sources

National economic impact and Australian energy security vulnerability

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

CANADA

STATE

3 sources

Global economic and humanitarian crisis with critique of American unpredictability

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

CHINA

STATE

2 sources

Chinese diplomatic mediation amid US-Iran escalation

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

SOUTH KOREA

2 sources

National economic impact amid Strait of Hormuz closure

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

EGYPT

2 sources

Egypt as guarantor of collective Arab security against Iranian regional actions

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

SPAIN

1 sources

European energy impact and pursuit of diplomatic balance amid escalation

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

UNITED STATES

2 sources

Existential Iranian threat justifying preventive American military escalation

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

FRANCE

STATE

4 sources

Technical expertise and escalation risk analysis with economic concerns

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

GREECE

1 sources

Direct Iranian threat to Europe via Cyprus justifying Western action

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

INDIA

2 sources

Strategic non-alignment balancing energy security and economic implications

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

IRAN

1 sources

Iran's technical and strategic resilience in the face of external threats

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

ISRAEL

2 sources

Israel as resilient victim facing Iranian aggression in a necessary defensive conflict

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

ITALY

1 sources

Geopolitical escalation viewed through European energy security and migration concerns

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

MALAYSIA

2 sources

Economic and energy impact on global and regional markets

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

MOROCCO

2 sources

Global economic impact and diplomatic neutrality amid energy tensions

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

PAKISTAN

1 sources

Economic focus and concern over regional energy consequences

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

PHILIPPINES

2 sources

Domestic economic impact and national energy security

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

QATAR

STATE

2 sources

Concerning regional escalation requiring multilateral diplomatic de-escalation

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

UNITED KINGDOM

4 sources

British vulnerability to the security and economic consequences of the conflict

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

RUSSIA

1 sources

Russia-Iran geopolitical solidarity against unjustified Western aggression

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

SINGAPORE

2 sources

Pragmatic economic and logistical analysis focused on commercial impacts

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

TURKEY

STATE

1 sources

Strategic non-alignment with focus on global economic impacts

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

UKRAINE

STATE

3 sources

Ukraine as technological and strategic pivot in the anti-Russia-Iran alignment

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media