CNN, MS NOW and Politico sue the Trump administration after being barred from the White House
published on
countries
sources
articles
the same fact, two accounts
SpainMadrid sees the exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico as a blatant infringement on the First Amendment, rather than a simple editorial dispute between the executive and rival newsrooms.
What each one tells
same framing
BrazilBrasília is deciphering the CNN-Politico-MS Now affair as the most concrete test of the first amendment's protections against an executive ready to transform presidential access into a revocable privilege.
- Spain
of exceptionalism
the narrative qualifies the measure as an unprecedented break in the history of the United States, emphasizing the severity of the gesture rather than the context of tensions between the executive and these editorial offices.
Relying on the statement from the complaining media
the narrative reproduces extensive quotes from the text of the three editorial offices concerned, without equivalent and developed counter-quotes from the White House.
What the account puts first
BrazilReproduces the framing of the official statement
the term used by the White House to describe access to the presidential premises is quoted without immediate contradictory rephrasing.
Cites Fox News
an operational detail about the rotation of the presidential pool is attributed to this government-allied network rather than an independent source.
and the figures
approximately 92%
Coverage of Trump deemed negative
%
same figure92%