INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT REMOVES CHIEF PROSECUTOR KARIM KHAN AMID MISCONDUCT ALLEGATIONSCOMPARATIVE VIEW
EXPLORE THIS STORY
SHARE THIS COMPARISON
Show your friends how the world sees the same news differently.
Member states of the International Criminal Court voted to remove chief prosecutor Karim Khan, who faces sexual misconduct allegations, plunging the institution into an internal crisis. The move comes as the Court handles sensitive cases, including arrest warrants against Israeli leaders, and reignites debate over its credibility, independence and the future of international justice.
🇧🇪 Belgium vs 🇿🇦 South Africa
FRAMING GAP
34/100MODERATE
Belgique: Brussels is concerned about an International Criminal Court that "is self-destructing," according to a former Belgian magistrate,… — Afrique du Sud: Pretoria is weighing the fallout of Prosecutor Khan's departure in light of its own legal battle with the ICC, which it disputes…
Here are the main framing differences identified between media coverages.
ANALYSIS BY COUNTRY
BELGIUMDOMINANT ANGLE
Brussels is concerned about an International Criminal Court that "is self-destructing," according to a former Belgian magistrate, even though a Belgian judge had previously cleared Karim Khan.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Belgium's capital is witnessing a significant development as 82 out of 125 States Parties to the International Criminal Court voted to revoke Karim Khan's position, exceeding the required 63 votes, while only 13 States voted for his retention
- •The independent panel of three judges, including Belgian judge Paul Lemmens, reviewed a 5,000-page report and unanimously concluded that there was no evidence against Khan
- •Former Belgian International Criminal Court judge Christine Van den Wyngaert states that the Court is "consumed from within" and has become "completely incredulous"
BIASES
Judicially centered framing: strong focus on the role of Belgian judge Paul Lemmens and the verdict of the independent panel, which received little attention in coverage from other countriesPreference for critical Belgian voices (Van den Wyngaert) on the credibility of the Court, over the official positions of states in favor of the voteLimited coverage of the status of ongoing International Criminal Court (ICC) cases, including the arrest warrants against Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu, following Khan's departure
SOUTH AFRICADOMINANT ANGLE
Pretoria is weighing the fallout of Prosecutor Khan's departure in light of its own legal battle with the ICC, which it disputes has jurisdiction over xenophobic violence targeting foreigners.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •South Africa's government notes that the 125 member states of the International Criminal Court voted by a large majority to revoke Karim Khan, a first for a chief prosecutor of the Court
- •South African officials are aware that Norwegian Deputy Minister Andreas Motzfeldt Kravik found, beyond a reasonable doubt, evidence of sexual harassment and abuse of power
- •The South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation, through Chrispin Phiri, has rejected as unfounded a complaint filed with the International Criminal Court by two Ghanaian officials against the South African state
BIASES
South Africa's judicial framework is closely watching Pretoria's own battle with the ICC, rather than the Court's internal governancePreference is given to sources reprinting the Associated Press dispatch, limiting the diversity of local editorial anglesLow coverage of the ICC's landmark cases, such as arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, which are absent from available articles
BELGIUMDOMINANT ANGLE
Brussels is concerned about an International Criminal Court that "is self-destructing," according to a former Belgian magistrate, even though a Belgian judge had previously cleared Karim Khan.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Belgium's capital is witnessing a significant development as 82 out of 125 States Parties to the International Criminal Court voted to revoke Karim Khan's position, exceeding the required 63 votes, while only 13 States voted for his retention
- •The independent panel of three judges, including Belgian judge Paul Lemmens, reviewed a 5,000-page report and unanimously concluded that there was no evidence against Khan
- •Former Belgian International Criminal Court judge Christine Van den Wyngaert states that the Court is "consumed from within" and has become "completely incredulous"
BIASES
Judicially centered framing: strong focus on the role of Belgian judge Paul Lemmens and the verdict of the independent panel, which received little attention in coverage from other countriesPreference for critical Belgian voices (Van den Wyngaert) on the credibility of the Court, over the official positions of states in favor of the voteLimited coverage of the status of ongoing International Criminal Court (ICC) cases, including the arrest warrants against Vladimir Putin and Benjamin Netanyahu, following Khan's departure
SOUTH AFRICADOMINANT ANGLE
Pretoria is weighing the fallout of Prosecutor Khan's departure in light of its own legal battle with the ICC, which it disputes has jurisdiction over xenophobic violence targeting foreigners.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •South Africa's government notes that the 125 member states of the International Criminal Court voted by a large majority to revoke Karim Khan, a first for a chief prosecutor of the Court
- •South African officials are aware that Norwegian Deputy Minister Andreas Motzfeldt Kravik found, beyond a reasonable doubt, evidence of sexual harassment and abuse of power
- •The South African Department of International Relations and Cooperation, through Chrispin Phiri, has rejected as unfounded a complaint filed with the International Criminal Court by two Ghanaian officials against the South African state
BIASES
South Africa's judicial framework is closely watching Pretoria's own battle with the ICC, rather than the Court's internal governancePreference is given to sources reprinting the Associated Press dispatch, limiting the diversity of local editorial anglesLow coverage of the ICC's landmark cases, such as arrest warrants for Israeli leaders, which are absent from available articles