MIDDLE EAST WAR: ENERGY TENSIONS AND GLOBAL CRISES

SOUTH AFRICA

1 sources

Critique of American unilateralism and promotion of multilateral resistance

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

GERMANY

STATE

3 sources

Economic critique of the global costs of military conflict pursued without German consultation

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

ARGENTINA

1 sources

Mobilising the Middle Eastern conflict to legitimise Milei's geopolitical pivot

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

AUSTRALIA

2 sources

Domestic economic impact and Australian energy vulnerability

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

CANADA

STATE

3 sources

Economic and security impact of the conflict on Canadian and Western interests

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

CHINA

STATE

2 sources

China as stabilising force amid Western military adventurism

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

SOUTH KOREA

2 sources

Domestic economic impact and cautious geopolitical withdrawal

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

EGYPT

2 sources

Regional stabilisation and protection of Egyptian energy interests

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

UNITED STATES

3 sources

Global energy war: Iran threatens worldwide economy

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

FRANCE

STATE

6 sources

Economic and energy impact on Europe, with France positioned as diplomatic mediator

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

GREECE

3 sources

Greek military capability framed as guarantor of European energy security

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

INDIA

2 sources

Geopolitical pragmatism with focus on energy security and economic implications

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

IRAQ

1 sources

Regional stability and strategic neutrality amid energy tensions

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

IRAN

1 sources

Systematic delegitimisation of the Iranian regime through documentation of state repression

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

ISRAEL

2 sources

Iranian existential threat justifying total and preventive military response

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

ITALY

1 sources

European energy and security concerns amid Iranian escalation

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

MALAYSIA

3 sources

Pragmatic neutrality focused on regional economic and commercial impacts

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

MOROCCO

2 sources

Geostrategic analysis prioritising global economic impacts over military dimensions of conflict

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

NIGERIA

3 sources

Energy and economic impact on Nigeria's oil-dependent economy

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

PAKISTAN

2 sources

Regional mediator bearing economic costs of an external conflict

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

QATAR

STATE

2 sources

Strategic victimhood: Qatar as innocent victim of unwarranted Iranian aggression

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

UNITED KINGDOM

4 sources

Critical distance from Washington, focus on economic impact and pursuit of diplomatic alternatives

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

RUSSIA

STATE

1 sources

Measured support for Iran balanced with preservation of regional energy interests

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

SINGAPORE

2 sources

Technocratic approach focused on global energy and economic impacts

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

TAIWAN

1 sources

Taiwan as priority yet vulnerable beneficiary of American military protection

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

THAILAND

1 sources

Global economic impact and pragmatic geopolitical non-alignment

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

TURKEY

STATE

1 sources

Regional energy stability and balanced multilateral diplomacy

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

UKRAINE

STATE

2 sources

Framing the Iran-US conflict through Ukraine's strategic interests

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media