DEADLY WILDFIRES RAVAGE ANDALUSIACOMPARATIVE VIEW
EXPLORE THIS STORY
SHARE THIS COMPARISON
Show your friends how the world sees the same news differently.
Wildfires fuelled by a severe heatwave tore through southern Spain's Andalusia region, killing at least twelve people and leaving around twenty-three missing, one of the country's deadliest blazes in twenty years.
🇦🇺 Australia vs 🇬🇧 United Kingdom
FRAMING GAP
29/100LOW
Australie: Canberra is gauging the extent of the Andalusian drama in light of its own experience with megafires, where ignored stay-at-home… — Royaume-Uni: London takes away from the Andalusian tragedy yet another confirmation of the climate urgency that is scorching Southern Europe…
Here are the main framing differences identified between media coverages.
ANALYSIS BY COUNTRY
AUSTRALIADOMINANT ANGLE
Canberra is gauging the extent of the Andalusian drama in light of its own experience with megafires, where ignored stay-at-home orders and car evacuations prove just as deadly as the flames themselves.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Australia's government is closely monitoring the situation in Spain, where at least 12 people have died and 23 are missing in the Almeria fire, one of the deadliest in Spain in twenty years.
- •Australians are concerned about the four victims, likely British nationals, who died in a right-hand drive vehicle, while eight others perished while fleeing on foot outside the evacuation plan.
- •The Australian capital's emergency services are taking note of the possible cause, a downed power line, which has not been confirmed, with around 150 firefighters deployed and the Military Emergency Unit providing support.
BIASES
Australia frames its national experience with bushfires as a comparative context, systematically linking the Andalusian drama to its own experience with megafires.Australian media shows a preference for institutional Spanish sources, such as Moreno and Sanz, which are relayed without counterpoint from victims or local residents.The coverage in Australia gives little attention to structural causes, such as climate change and land development, instead focusing on the factual account of the human toll.
UNITED KINGDOMDOMINANT ANGLE
London takes away from the Andalusian tragedy yet another confirmation of the climate urgency that is scorching Southern Europe and threatens even heavier tolls in the future.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •In London, concerns are growing as at least twelve deaths have been confirmed in the Los Gallardos fire in Almería, with some victims found in vehicles surrounded by flames, according to reports
- •The UK government is monitoring the situation as 150 firefighters have been deployed to Bedar, where 1,000 residents have been evacuated, and up to 19 people are reported missing
- •From the UK's perspective, the EU has deployed 777 firefighters from 14 countries to high-risk areas, including Cyprus, Greece, Italy, France, Spain, and Portugal, as temperatures soar to 40°C
BIASES
The dominant climate framing: the UK government notes that articles consistently link the Andalusian wildfire to the climate crisis and continental warming, to the detriment of other local factors.The London-based press shows a preference for institutional Spanish sources, such as the Andalusian government and regional minister, over direct testimony from those affected.There is limited coverage of preventive measures or political responsibilities leading up to the disaster, with the focus instead on the human and meteorological toll.
AUSTRALIADOMINANT ANGLE
Canberra is gauging the extent of the Andalusian drama in light of its own experience with megafires, where ignored stay-at-home orders and car evacuations prove just as deadly as the flames themselves.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Australia's government is closely monitoring the situation in Spain, where at least 12 people have died and 23 are missing in the Almeria fire, one of the deadliest in Spain in twenty years.
- •Australians are concerned about the four victims, likely British nationals, who died in a right-hand drive vehicle, while eight others perished while fleeing on foot outside the evacuation plan.
- •The Australian capital's emergency services are taking note of the possible cause, a downed power line, which has not been confirmed, with around 150 firefighters deployed and the Military Emergency Unit providing support.
BIASES
Australia frames its national experience with bushfires as a comparative context, systematically linking the Andalusian drama to its own experience with megafires.Australian media shows a preference for institutional Spanish sources, such as Moreno and Sanz, which are relayed without counterpoint from victims or local residents.The coverage in Australia gives little attention to structural causes, such as climate change and land development, instead focusing on the factual account of the human toll.
UNITED KINGDOMDOMINANT ANGLE
London takes away from the Andalusian tragedy yet another confirmation of the climate urgency that is scorching Southern Europe and threatens even heavier tolls in the future.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •In London, concerns are growing as at least twelve deaths have been confirmed in the Los Gallardos fire in Almería, with some victims found in vehicles surrounded by flames, according to reports
- •The UK government is monitoring the situation as 150 firefighters have been deployed to Bedar, where 1,000 residents have been evacuated, and up to 19 people are reported missing
- •From the UK's perspective, the EU has deployed 777 firefighters from 14 countries to high-risk areas, including Cyprus, Greece, Italy, France, Spain, and Portugal, as temperatures soar to 40°C
BIASES
The dominant climate framing: the UK government notes that articles consistently link the Andalusian wildfire to the climate crisis and continental warming, to the detriment of other local factors.The London-based press shows a preference for institutional Spanish sources, such as the Andalusian government and regional minister, over direct testimony from those affected.There is limited coverage of preventive measures or political responsibilities leading up to the disaster, with the focus instead on the human and meteorological toll.