
Common ground and differences in coverage across the media analysed.
Iran transmitted a 14-point peace plan via Pakistan, responding to a US 9-point plan
The Iranian plan proposes ending the war in 30 days, gradually reopening Hormuz, and halting all hostilities
Trump declared he cannot 'imagine' the plan being acceptable, citing 47 years of Iranian actions against 'humanity'
The Iranian plan deliberately omits the nuclear program. Washington and Israel demand denuclearization be at the core of any deal. Tehran wants to first resolve Hormuz and hostilities, then negotiate the nuclear issue separately in exchange for sanctions relief. A sequencing that Australia and Canada analyze as a deliberate Iranian decoupling strategy.
Coverage that diverges
Trump invokes 47 years of Iranian actions against 'humanity' to justify his rejection. Iran retorts that it was Washington and Israel who launched the war on February 28. France and Canada see a deadlock of legitimacy: each party considers itself the victim. Egypt tries to defuse by highlighting the Iranian plan's increased flexibility.
Coverage aligned with this reading
This grouping describes the publications analysed, not the position of these countries’ populations or of their governments.
Preview: 3 of 12 media perspectives. Syntheses of the media analysed — not direct quotations. Method & limitations
A 3-phase plan: war first, nuclear later — Tehran demands guarantees against renewed strikes
1 source · View sources
Trump: 'I cannot imagine this plan being acceptable — they haven't paid a big enough price'
1 source · View sources
What's in Iran's plan — and what's notably missing: the nuclear program
1 source · View sources
DOMINANT ANGLE
A 3-phase plan: war first, nuclear later — Tehran demands guarantees against renewed strikes
ANALYSIS
Iran transmitted its 14-point peace plan via Pakistan on Thursday evening, described by Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei as a plan 'focused on ending the war.
DOMINANT ANGLE
Trump: 'I cannot imagine this plan being acceptable — they haven't paid a big enough price'
ANALYSIS
Donald Trump did not wait to finish formally reviewing the Iranian plan before publicly rejecting it.
DOMINANT ANGLE
What's in Iran's plan — and what's notably missing: the nuclear program
ANALYSIS
ABC global affairs editor Laura Tingle, writing from Jerusalem, offers an incisive analysis of the Iranian plan: 'You might notice there is no mention of the future of Iran's nuclear capabilities, nor any real shift in Iran's claims to be able to control the Strait of Hormuz.
DOMINANT ANGLE
France 24: Tehran warns — the US chooses between the impossible and a bad deal
ANALYSIS
France 24 covered the warning from Iran's Revolutionary Guards in detail: the US faces a choice between an 'impossible' military operation or a 'bad deal.
DOMINANT ANGLE
Globe and Mail: Iran's 3-phase plan shows 'greater flexibility' — Trump is 'not satisfied'
ANALYSIS
The Globe and Mail, drawing on the Wall Street Journal, details Iran's 3 phases.
DOMINANT ANGLE
SCMP: Trump 'reviews' the Iranian plan while threatening strikes and projecting a Hormuz reopening
ANALYSIS
The South China Morning Post analyzes Trump's ambivalent posture: Saturday, the US president said he was reviewing the Iranian plan while maintaining he could not imagine finding it acceptable.
DOMINANT ANGLE
Trump rejects Iranian plan as 'unacceptable': Jerusalem backs the hard line on denuclearization
ANALYSIS
The Jerusalem Post provided detailed coverage of the 14-point Iranian plan.
DOMINANT ANGLE
Islamabad maintains pressure: Pakistan's PM, FM and army chief all push for renewed direct negotiations
ANALYSIS
Pakistan is at the heart of the diplomatic process: Islamabad transmitted Iran's 14-point plan to the US and the US response to Tehran.
DOMINANT ANGLE
Daily News Egypt: Trump doubts the Iranian plan but Washington already responded; details reveal a nuclear option in phase 2
ANALYSIS
The Daily News Egypt publishes the most analytical coverage of the three phases of the Iranian plan, detailing what other media missed: the second phase provides for a 'potential freeze on uranium enrichment' in exchange for sanctions relief — a nuclear concession that, if confirmed, represents a significant shift in Iranian posture.
DOMINANT ANGLE
Moscow: the Iranian plan is serious; Trump prefers maximum pressure to real diplomacy
ANALYSIS
Russian media present Trump's public and preemptive rejection of the Iranian plan — before formally reviewing it — as proof that Washington is not seeking a diplomatic resolution but total Iranian capitulation.
DOMINANT ANGLE
New Delhi watches negotiations with growing concern: any failure postpones Hormuz reopening indefinitely
ANALYSIS
India is following the Iran-US negotiations with growing concern.
DOMINANT ANGLE
Singapore: the US will become 'oil supplier of last resort' as long as Hormuz stays blocked
ANALYSIS
The Straits Times of Singapore analyzes the economic consequences of the Iran-US negotiation impasse.
Explore every perspective on this subject across 12 countries.
Compare viewpoints and see where they diverge.
published on
countries
sources
articles
gap
Iran has transmitted, through Pakistan, a fourteen-point peace plan presented as a response to a nine-point American plan. The document proposes ending the war within thirty days, gradually reopening the Strait of Hormuz, and halting all hostilities. Tehran has confirmed receiving the American counter-proposal, also via Islamabad, and says it is studying it.
The plan rests on a phased logic: first settle the military and economic questions, then address the nuclear file separately, a subject deliberately left out of the text. That omission lies at the heart of the tensions, with some actors holding that denuclearization must be at the center of any agreement from the outset.
The context clarifies what is at stake. Since 8 April 2026, a ceasefire has held between the two sides, but talks have been stalled since a first round in Islamabad. The fourteen-point plan marks a shift in approach: rather than an immediate comprehensive settlement, it proposes a three-stage progression that decouples the military track from the nuclear one.
Positions remain opposed. On one side, the public rejection of the plan is justified by the argument that Iran has not yet made sufficient concessions; on the other, Tehran maintains that it has put forward a good-faith proposal and blames the other party for starting the war. Pakistan's role as mediator, retaining the trust of both sides, remains uncertain after the failure of the first direct round.
Several unknowns persist: the real scope of the concessions mentioned for a later phase, the possibility of renewed hostilities, and the ability of diplomatic channels to revive a dialogue at a standstill.
Measured with the previous method (distance between texts), on a different scale.