
this subject is more divergent than 8% of recent comparable stories
United States
The United States government first considers tracking and qualifying it as terrorism: the American press relays the official toll, the images of the state television and the royal promise of retaliation "with an iron hand".
What each one tells
Australia
Canberra is closely monitoring the attack on Karak by tracking the shooters: Australian media is reporting the successive tolls, the lack of claims and the exceptional nature of such violence in a Jordan deemed relatively stable.
United States
through royal qualification
the Fox News title highlights the term terrorism used by the king.
What the account puts first
Australia
Regional
PerthNow links the attack to the strikes against Iran and the Iranian attacks targeting Jordan this year, without any element linking the shooters to Iran.
Relying on official sources
the ABC relies on state media and Jordanian authorities, which explains the successive different tolls.
United States
Minimal community context
the three dispatches limit themselves to one sentence about the Christian minority in Karak.
What it leaves out
Australia
this perspective does not carry this information
and the figures
this press does not report this figure
Number of injured
injured
40 injured
What each country's press ran as a headline, as published, in its original language. These headlines are not translated.
published on
countries
sources
articles
gap
More divergent than 8% of recent comparable stories (reference: 98 recent stories measured with the same method).