• Political or pastoral scope

  Argentina frames the visit as a political event championed by the Milei government and linked to Francis's legacy, while Uruguay and Peru emphasize its pastoral, social, or identity dimension rather than its power implications.

  Coverage aligned with this reading

  Argentina

  Coverage that diverges

  UruguayPeru

• Response from excluded countries

  Mexico pursues active diplomatic engagement, through a meeting between Claudia Sheinbaum and the Vatican Secretary of State, in hopes of a future visit, while Brazil shows no official response from government or the episcopal conference in the coverage pool regarding its absence from the itinerary.

  Coverage aligned with this reading

  Mexico

  Coverage that diverges

  Brazil

• Regional tensions in the background

  Uruguay notes, through its foreign minister, that bilateral tension between Argentina and Brazil weighs on the regional context of the journey, while Argentine and Brazilian coverage of the papal visit does not mention this tension.

  Coverage aligned with this reading

  Uruguay

  Coverage that diverges

  ArgentinaBrazil

This grouping describes the publications analysed, not the position of these countries’ populations or of their governments.

Measured with the previous method (distance between texts), on a different scale.