Netanyahu calls the genocide accusation "the biggest lie of the century" at the UN, before a half-empty hall
published on
countries
sources
articles
the same fact, two accounts
this subject is more divergent than 51% of the subjects analysed
NorwayOslo is dissociating the protocol attitude of its delegation, which remained seated and unmoved in the hemicycle, from the firm condemnation later pronounced by its Minister of Foreign Affairs Espen Barth Eide.
What each one tells
opposition
AustraliaCanberra sees Netanyahu's speech at the UN as an electoral calculation ahead of the October 27 vote in Israel, rather than as a response to the genocide accusation.
- Norway
Election-centric
the narrative interprets the speech primarily as an address to Israeli public opinion ahead of the legislative elections.
Focus on the ICC procedure rather than the ICJ
the coverage details the arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court without mentioning the pending genocide complaint before the International Court of Justice.
What the account puts first
AustraliaElectoral
the narrative is read first through the calculation of the Israeli campaign rather than through the genocide accusation itself.
Relying on a critical source
former ambassador Michael Oren, an opponent of Netanyahu's line, serves as a unique key to interpreting the intentions of the speech.
and the figures
this press does not report this figure
Delegations have left the room
delegations
only one reports it77 delegations