EXPLORE THIS STORY
MEMORY WAR: POLAND STRIPS ZELENSKY OF ITS HIGHEST DISTINCTION
Kyiv views the Polish revocation of Zelensky's Order of the White Eagle as a strategic miscalculation that benefits Moscow alone, yet Ukrainian officials maintain that the diplomatic rift will not undermine the broader alliance framework.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
Kyiv, June 21, 2026. The diplomatic crisis between Poland and Ukraine crossed a significant threshold on June 20 when President Volodymyr Zelensky announced he had mailed back the Order of the White Eagle to his Polish counterpart Karol Nawrocki. In a gesture at once symbolic and deliberately ironic, Zelensky paired the announcement with a photograph of the package and a pointed remark: "If this distinction could remain in the hands of Catherine II, Benito Mussolini, and Gerhard Schroeder, we in Ukraine will not contest that decision." The statement, relayed by the Kyiv Post, captures the Ukrainian mood: clear rejection of the Polish decision, coupled with a refusal to sever ties with a strategic partner.
Kyiv's response reflects firm geopolitical analysis. Ukraine's foreign minister Andrii Sybiha characterized Nawrocki's decision as a "strategic mistake that will benefit only Moscow." Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk shared this assessment, distancing himself from the presidential move: "A conflict between Poland and Ukraine pleases Putin and shocks our allies," he wrote on X, urging both presidents to "ease passions, not inflame tensions." Ukrainian officials pointedly invoked Tusk—a pro-European and pro-Ukrainian figure—to signal that Warsaw is divided and that Nawrocki's decision reflects internal Polish politics rather than a fundamental alliance breakdown.
The dispute centers on historical memory. Nawrocki justified the revocation by citing Ukraine's decision to award the honorific title "Hero of the UPA" to a military unit, referring to the Ukrainian Insurgent Army, a nationalist organization active during and after World War II. Poland holds the UPA responsible for civilian massacres in Volhynia. Kyiv acknowledged the historical weight of the issue but argued that Nawrocki had raised the possibility beforehand, diplomatic exchanges had occurred, and Ukraine saw no reason to alter the unit designation. Zbigniew Bogucki, head of the Polish presidential chancellery, stated that "Ukraine missed an opportunity that was offered"; Kyiv maintained that some decisions are not subject to negotiation.
Ukrainian national solidarity proved notable. Three former presidents—Leonid Kuchma, Viktor Yushchenko, and Petro Poroshenko—also relinquished their own Order of the White Eagle decorations. Kuchma, who received the award in 1997, recalled his reconciliation work with former Polish President Aleksander Kwasniewski under the principle "forgive and ask for forgiveness," expressing the pain of surrendering this symbol today. The unified voice from across Ukraine's political spectrum reinforced the narrative that this crisis was externally imposed.
Ukrainian media outlets circulated polling data from United Surveys conducted June 12-14—before the revocation—indicating that 58.3 percent of Poles believed Zelensky held a negative attitude toward Poland, while only 30.1 percent viewed him positively. These figures, predating the escalation, underscore the depth of perception gap that already existed. Against this backdrop, Kyiv emphasized its commitment to cooperating with Warsaw to "prevent historical misunderstandings," while resisting the notion that Volhynia's memory should become leverage over Ukraine's sovereign military symbolism choices.
Russia-centric geopolitical framing: Ukrainian media consistently reinterpret the Polish-Ukrainian disagreement through the lens of Moscow's strategic gain, downplaying domestic Polish political motivations and legitimate historical grievances.
Selective amplification of pro-Ukrainian Polish voices: Donald Tusk's criticism of Nawrocki receives prominent play while Polish arguments supporting the revocation receive minimal coverage, creating an impression of united Polish approval when sentiment is actually divided.
Limited exploration of Volhynia's historical significance: While UPA wartime massacres are mentioned, their scope and impact on Polish national memory receive cursory treatment, with coverage emphasizing Ukrainian national unity rather than balanced historical acknowledgment.
AI-generated content — Analyses are produced by artificial intelligence from press articles. They may contain errors or biases. Learn more
Discover how another country covers this same story.