VENEZUELA EARTHQUAKES: OVER 2,600 DEAD AS ANGER GROWS AT CRISIS RESPONSECOMPARATIVE VIEW
EXPLORE THIS STORY
SHARE THIS COMPARISON
Show your friends how the world sees the same news differently.
A week after earthquakes killed more than 2,600 people in Venezuela, hopes of finding survivors fade. Citizens and the opposition decry a failing response while the government blames 'propaganda'.
🇵🇭 Philippines vs 🇵🇪 Pérou
FRAMING GAP
83/100HIGH
Perspectives diverge strongly
Here are the main framing differences identified between media coverages.
ANALYSIS BY COUNTRY
PÉROUDOMINANT ANGLE
Lima is examining the Venezuelan tragedy from a regional perspective: 2,645 deaths, massive international solidarity, and a government response that has been widely questioned.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Peru's neighboring country has seen 2,645 deaths and 12,666 injuries: the double earthquake on June 24 is the deadliest in a century, surpassing the 245 deaths in the July 1967 earthquake
- •Peruvian rescue efforts are part of a larger international response, with 3,000 rescuers from 33 countries deployed; 13 survivors extracted, including Hernán Gil (43 years old) after 8 days under the rubble of Playa del Mar
- •According to assessments, the NASA projects over 58,000 buildings destroyed or damaged; 15,050 people left homeless, 890 aftershocks recorded since June 24
BIASES
Factual-humanitarian framing: Peruvian coverage prioritizes numbers and international relief efforts over the underlying causes of vulnerabilityPreference for official and UN sources: contradictory testimonies from survivors are reported through foreign press, not collected directlyLimited contextualization of internal politics: controversy over government management is covered but less in-depth than the human toll
PHILIPPINESDOMINANT ANGLE
Manila is gauging the extent of the Venezuelan disaster through the lens of its own seismic vulnerability: the 7.2 and 7.5 magnitudes that killed 2,645 people directly evoke the 'Big One' feared under Metro Manila.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •The earthquakes on June 24 (7.2 and 7.5) killed 2,645 people and injured more than 12,600, with 50,000 missing according to the UN
- •Hernan Alberto Gil, 44, was rescued after nearly eight days under the rubble of the Galerias Playa Grande shopping center thanks to a multinational consortium of rescuers
- •According to the Metro Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study, a 7.2-magnitude earthquake in Manila could instantly kill more than 34,000 people and injure 110,000
BIASES
Local resonance framing: Philippine coverage draws a parallel with Metro Manila's seismic vulnerability, focusing the topic on domestic preparationPreference for international solidarity: emphasis is placed on spectacular rescues and multinational mobilization rather than Venezuelan political tensionsLow coverage of political tensions: accusations between the Venezuelan government and opposition are mentioned without in-depth analysis
PHILIPPINESDOMINANT ANGLE
Manila is gauging the extent of the Venezuelan disaster through the lens of its own seismic vulnerability: the 7.2 and 7.5 magnitudes that killed 2,645 people directly evoke the 'Big One' feared under Metro Manila.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •The earthquakes on June 24 (7.2 and 7.5) killed 2,645 people and injured more than 12,600, with 50,000 missing according to the UN
- •Hernan Alberto Gil, 44, was rescued after nearly eight days under the rubble of the Galerias Playa Grande shopping center thanks to a multinational consortium of rescuers
- •According to the Metro Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study, a 7.2-magnitude earthquake in Manila could instantly kill more than 34,000 people and injure 110,000
BIASES
Local resonance framing: Philippine coverage draws a parallel with Metro Manila's seismic vulnerability, focusing the topic on domestic preparationPreference for international solidarity: emphasis is placed on spectacular rescues and multinational mobilization rather than Venezuelan political tensionsLow coverage of political tensions: accusations between the Venezuelan government and opposition are mentioned without in-depth analysis
PÉROUDOMINANT ANGLE
Lima is examining the Venezuelan tragedy from a regional perspective: 2,645 deaths, massive international solidarity, and a government response that has been widely questioned.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Peru's neighboring country has seen 2,645 deaths and 12,666 injuries: the double earthquake on June 24 is the deadliest in a century, surpassing the 245 deaths in the July 1967 earthquake
- •Peruvian rescue efforts are part of a larger international response, with 3,000 rescuers from 33 countries deployed; 13 survivors extracted, including Hernán Gil (43 years old) after 8 days under the rubble of Playa del Mar
- •According to assessments, the NASA projects over 58,000 buildings destroyed or damaged; 15,050 people left homeless, 890 aftershocks recorded since June 24
BIASES
Factual-humanitarian framing: Peruvian coverage prioritizes numbers and international relief efforts over the underlying causes of vulnerabilityPreference for official and UN sources: contradictory testimonies from survivors are reported through foreign press, not collected directlyLimited contextualization of internal politics: controversy over government management is covered but less in-depth than the human toll