The news through the eyes of the entire world. Break out of your information bubble.

GET THE PRISM · EVERY SATURDAY

Every Saturday, the week’s important changes and the perspectives that explain them. Get the free summary.

EXPLORE

SUBJECTS
THEMES
COUNTRIES
FILES
THE PRISM

THE PROJECT

METHODOLOGY
OUR SOURCES
ABOUT
TEAM
CONTACT
LEGAL NOTICE
Terms of Sale

YOUR SPACE

MY ACCOUNT

THE REFRACT 2026RSS INSTAGRAMEVERY STORY HAS MANY SIDES

Conflits & Securite

Trump threatens Iran and seeks a naval coalition to secure Hormuz

BY COUNTRYSIDE BY SIDE BLIND SPOTS

Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media

← SUBJECTS

Argentina

2 SOURCES

Legitimization of Western Military Action Against the Existential Iranian Threat

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

Australia

1 SOURCE

Single source

Critique of weakened Trump making impulsive military decisions

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

China

STATE MEDIA

1 SOURCE

Single source

American Institutional Dysfunctions and Diversion of Geostrategy Issues

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

South Korea

1 SOURCE

Single source

Balanced diplomacy between Atlanticist loyalty and geopolitical caution

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

Spain

1 SOURCE

Single source

European Resistance to American Techno-Authoritarian Hegemony Under Trump

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

Iraq

1 SOURCE

Single source

Strategic neutrality in the face of crisis, emphasis on global economic issues

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

Qatar

STATE MEDIA

1 SOURCE

Single source

Systemic Critique of Trump's Unilateralism and Geopolitical Overreach

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

United Kingdom

2 SOURCES

British pragmatism in the face of Trumpian erraticism over Hormuz

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

Russia

STATE MEDIA

2 SOURCES

Trump as a pragmatic partner in an emerging multipolar order

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

Singapore

1 SOURCE

Single source

Prioritization of Sino-American Trade Issues Over Military Tensions with Iran

VIEW PERSPECTIVES

HOME
/
SUBJECTS
/
TRUMP THREATENS IRAN AND SEEKS A NAVAL COALITION TO SECURE HORMUZ

published on

March 15, 2026

countries

sources

articles

42/100

gap

Measured with the previous method (distance between texts), on a different scale.

Measures differences in framing across the media analysed. It does not measure truth, public opinion or political disagreement. The number is the probability that two countries picked at random frame the event differently (0 = all on the same frame).