this subject is more divergent than 92% of the subjects analysed
United States
The United States government claims a calibrated response: three Iranian oil tankers taken out of service for two American ships targeted, with no loss of life reported.
What each one tells
United Kingdom
London is gauging the overnight escalation of Saturday, 5 September, less by the exchanged gunfire than by its cost: Brent at its highest since 24 July, a blockade against a counter-blockade, and a "shadow fleet" that the US says it has struck three times.
United States
The United States government's account of the night's events is presented as fact, based solely on the US military's statement released through CENTCOM.
The Iranian version of events is omitted
Tehran's official response to the strikes was not available at the time of publication.
The evidence cited is from one side
images of the strikes come exclusively from the US military's statement.
What the account puts first
United Kingdom
The UK government views the economic framing of the escalation
both media outlets measure the military confrontation by its effect on oil markets rather than its tactical outcome.
Relying on official statements
both reported versions rely almost exclusively on statements from CENTCOM and the Iranian agency Irib, with no independent source cited.
and the figures
three Iranian tankers permanently put out of service
Number of Iranian tankers destroyed
oil tankers
two tankers "permanently put out of use" and a third destroyed
this press does not report this figure
Share of Iranian oil exports through Kharg before the war
percentage of Iranian oil exports
90% of its pre-war crude

published on
countries
sources
articles
gap