The divergence score measures the framing gap between the world’s newsrooms on the same event. The higher the score, the more the narrative fractures along borders.
Four unrelated events — a Himalayan natural disaster, a Californian legal settlement, a South American oil deal, an American consular decision — and the same reading reflex: « what does this change for us ». This is not an opinion about those subjects, it is a count: on each of them, the largest group of countries applies the sovereignty frame. The world does not comment on the event, it comments on its own position relative to it.
A reader going through this week's twelve subjects sees the scores jump from 5 to 71 on 27 August and could conclude the world fractured that day. Nothing happened on 27 August: we changed instruments. The first six subjects are scored by a semantic distance between our own texts; the next six by the dispersion of the frames each country chooses. The two numbers share neither median nor meaning — and on the new scale, a random draw would give 85. A score of 56 therefore signals STRUCTURE, not disorder.
Weak signals and narrative shifts are the Prism’s deep analysis: what newsrooms have not yet named. Subscribers only. The blind spots stay free.
A border crisis between Spain and Morocco, told by ten countries, none of which is Morocco. This is not Moroccan silence: our collection runs there — twenty-nine articles in forty-four hours — but with only two mastheads and a median length of 363 characters, that is feed summaries, not articles. The second protagonist is missing through our fault, not its own.
India is one of the main buyers of Venezuelan crude: if Washington controls access to it, India's supply moves. Yet it is absent from the thirteen perspectives — a single article, a single masthead in our corpus, below the two-distinct-sources threshold we impose on ourselves. A collection gap, not an attention gap.
Washington suspends immigrant visa appointments worldwide, and the American press is absent from the ten perspectives. The decision is told by those who bear it — five Latin American countries, Bangladesh, Pakistan — and by France. The country making the decision is not in the corpus: our collection did not find two distinct American mastheads on this subject within the window.
Dated, falsifiable predictions, judged publicly. The statement and deadline are free — the reasoning behind them is for subscribers. We settle them later, won and lost alike.
The statement is free. Reading the world, less so. Access the weak signals, the narrative shifts and the full reasoning behind every prediction.
Complete weak signals, narrative shifts with evidence, and the reasoning behind every prediction.
$4.99/month$39.99 /year · save 33%
Show your friends how the world sees the same news differently.
Get the Weekly every Saturday morning. Free.
Eleven frames are offered to the newsrooms, and two absorb half of them. Sovereignty alone accounts for forty percent of the week's seventy framed perspectives, and appears on five of the six subjects. At the other end, the health-and-environment frame is chosen once out of seventy — by Japan, on the Himalayan floods. It is not that the environment is absent from the subjects: it is that it is almost never the angle.