EXPLORE THIS STORY
ALLEGED IRANIAN PLOT TO ASSASSINATE DONALD TRUMP
London is questioning the solidity of the intelligence cited by Israel, while also focusing on the verbal gaffes made by Trump during the NATO summit in Ankara.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
London, July 11, 2026. The British press is treating the announcement of a presumed Iranian plot against Donald Trump with caution tinged with journalistic skepticism, focusing more on the contradictions of the American president than on the substance of the Israeli intelligence cited.
In the UK, officials are approaching the situation with a critical eye, with The Independent, citing the Wall Street Journal and CNN, reporting that American officials familiar with the case have indicated that the UK's ally had "not validated" the information transmitted by Israel, suggesting that the alert could also be intended to steer the Trump administration towards Israel's position in the conflict with Iran. This nuance, picked up by several London titles, contrasts with the magnitude of the presidential statements.
The British government is also weighing in, with some officials expressing concerns about the potential consequences of the situation. Donald Trump himself has downplayed the significance of the intelligence transmitted, telling the New York Post: "Israel didn't find anything." He nonetheless confirmed having given instructions to his advisors: "I've given instructions — if something happens to me, literally bomb them at levels they've never seen." The president had made similar comments as early as February 2025, promising that Iran "would be wiped off the map" in the event of an assassination.
The British tabloids, such as the Daily Mail, are emphasizing the climate surrounding the NATO summit in Ankara, where Iranian parliamentarians allegedly called for striking Trump directly on site, and where the funeral of Ayatollah Khamenei, attended by 43 million people according to state television, saw a speaker openly call for his death. The president has repeatedly mentioned his own mortality, saying he is "target number one" and estimating he has "been lucky so far."
The British coverage also highlights the president's approximations, notably his confusion during a conference with Volodymyr Zelensky, in which he attributed a missile attack to the "Islamic Republic of Japan" instead of Iran — a slip-up that the London press judges to be revealing of the climate of confusion surrounding these repeated announcements.
For British editors, the issue goes beyond Trump's person: the fragility of the ceasefire, the partial closure of the Strait of Hormuz, and the resumption of American strikes on Iran form the real backdrop to a narrative dominated by presidential rhetoric more than verified evidence. Several articles also mention the near-paralysis of maritime traffic in the strait, with ships having cut off their AIS transponders to avoid detection, a further sign of the gravity of the underlying crisis behind the announcement of the plot.
The British coverage relies almost exclusively on statements from Trump and American sources, without a direct Iranian perspective, presenting a US-centered framing
British headlines prioritize shocking quotes and presidential gaffes over analysis of the intelligence itself, leveraging sensationalism
There is limited coverage of Iran's official stance, with no direct reaction from Tehran reported in the available articles
Trump's instructions if Iran assassinates him: 'Literally bomb them at levels that they've never seen before'
Israel shared intelligence of new Iranian plot to kill Trump with US officials, report says
Trump confuses Iran for US ally in Zelensky Q&A: 'We had 111 missiles shot by the Islamic Republic of Japan'
Discover how another country covers this same story.