EXPLORE THIS STORY
THE UNITED STATES STRIKES IRAN AGAIN AS TEHRAN DECLARES THE STRAIT OF HORMUZ CLOSED
The United States government justifies the resumption of strikes as a proportionate response to Iranian attacks on tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, while maintaining a channel of technical discussions with Tehran.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
The United States government views the resumption of strikes against Iran as a necessary response to a clear violation of the ceasefire signed last month. After three oil tankers were attacked in the Strait of Hormuz, President Donald Trump characterized Iran's actions as "acts of terrorism" and stated, on the sidelines of the NATO summit in Ankara, that the ceasefire was "over". The Treasury Department immediately revoked the waiver that allowed Tehran to continue selling its oil despite sanctions.
According to US officials cited by Axios and CNBC, the United States is now demanding a public declaration from Iran acknowledging that the strait remains open and that commercial ships will no longer be targeted - an ultimatum set for Saturday, conveyed through an Omani mediator. These officials cite an internal power struggle in Tehran, where a "radical faction" of the Revolutionary Guards is seeking to undermine the agreement, in violation of the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) that provided for safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz without tolls for 60 days.
On the military front, two days of US strikes have resulted in at least 14 deaths and 78 injuries on the Iranian side, according to Iran's Ministry of Health, cited by NPR. In retaliation, Tehran targeted Bahrain, home to the US Fifth Fleet, as well as Kuwait, Qatar, and Jordan, where air raid sirens sounded. However, the United States emphasizes that naval escorts are already allowing the export of 5 to 8 million barrels per day via the southern corridor along the waters of Oman, compared to over 20 million before the war - proof, according to Energy Secretary Chris Wright, that Iran "no longer has the means to close the strait".
Despite the apparent breakdown, the Trump administration is maintaining a channel for "technical discussions", according to CNBC: the MOU remains, in Washington's view, based on performance, and Iran's failure to comply with its simplest terms raises doubts about its ability to honor a future nuclear agreement. Trump himself suggested on Friday that Tehran had recalled its negotiators, while questioning their sincerity: "I don't know if they're worthy of making a deal." Qatar, Pakistan, Turkey, Egypt, and Saudi Arabia are meanwhile multiplying their mediation efforts to avoid the collapse of the process.
The United States government's perspective is centered around the Trump administration: quotes are drawn almost exclusively from American officials, often unnamed.
Preference is given to the official narrative: attributing the attacks to a "radical Iranian faction" relies on unverified American sources that have not been independently confirmed.
Limited coverage of Iranian voices and the human toll: the analysis focuses on diplomacy and oil markets rather than civilian casualties in Iran.
Discover how another country covers this same story.