
this subject is more divergent than 81% of recent comparable stories
Norway
Oslo initially retains the qualification of "rasistisk angrep" posed by the mayor of Trappes, and is following the anti-terrorist investigation in France through still provisional reports.
What each one tells
United Kingdom
London is reconstructing the timeline of the shootings and the anti-terrorist seizure more than the French political debate: British media are detailing the sequence of events, the toll, and the criminal qualification of an act deemed racist.
Norway
by officials
the narrative begins with the Interior Minister's qualification, before the investigation elements.
What the account puts first
United Kingdom
of the carnage
the Daily Mail highlights the intention to cause maximum casualties.
Relying on mayors
the BBC relies on the mayor of Trappes to describe the facts and the victims.
Norway
Reliance on a local elected official
the racial dimension rests on the words of the mayor of Trappes.
What it leans on
United Kingdom
this perspective does not carry this information
What each country's press ran as a headline, as published, in its original language. These headlines are not translated.
published on
countries
sources
articles
gap
More divergent than 81% of recent comparable stories (reference: 98 recent stories measured with the same method).