EXPLORE THIS STORY
HEGSETH ORDERS ANNUAL TESTOSTERONE SCREENING FOR US TROOPS
The United States government views the announcement as an extension of the Defense Secretary's personal crusade on military masculinity, rather than a comprehensive healthcare reform.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
The United States government is implementing a new policy, as announced by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in a video posted on X titled "The High-T Department of War", which requires annual testosterone level testing for all military personnel over 30 years old. According to The Atlantic, Hegseth explains that low testosterone levels may lead to a "recommendation" for hormone replacement therapy, although this will not be mandatory - a nuance he accompanies with a speech praising the ability of testosterone to "restore and optimize your natural abilities", which suggests, according to the magazine, that widespread adoption is the implicit goal.
This measure extends the line defended by Hegseth since his 2024 book, The War on Warriors, in which he denounced a Pentagon that had become "feminized and complacent" and criticized the "Pentagon wimps" who, in his view, refused to defend soldiers. Since his appointment, he has blocked promotions of female officers, removed the first woman to lead the Navy, and ordered a review of the "effectiveness" of women in ground combat positions, The Atlantic recalls, questioning both the cost to taxpayers and the actual capacity of military health system laboratories to absorb such a volume of tests.
This push for testosterone testing does not occur in isolation. The same week, Republican Representative Ben Cline introduced a bill in Congress aimed at restricting membership in the Daughters of the American Revolution to "biological women", accusing the organization of having given in to a "radical gender ideology" by opening its ranks to transgender individuals, Fox News reports. Both initiatives, one military and the other associative, reflect a climate in which the biological definition of gender is becoming a legislative battleground in the United States, driven by a wing of the Republican Party seeking to restore what it sees as traditional norms.
No detailed official reaction from the Pentagon or independent medical counterargument is included in the available coverage, which remains dominated by a critical tone towards Hegseth's initiative, deemed costly, logistically uncertain, and symptomatic of an obsession with masculinity being turned into public policy.
The United States government faces scrutiny over its handling of the issue, with available coverage largely framing Hegseth's initiative with a skeptical tone, without directly relaying his defense of the measure.
The US media shows a preference for the culture-gender angle, with sources linking the military measure to other legislative debates on the biological definition of gender the same week, sparking discussions across the United States.
The United States sees limited coverage of medical expertise, as no source cites an endocrinologist or independent clinical study on the benefits or risks of widespread hormone screening.
Discover how another country covers this same story.