A judge orders the White House to restore access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico, yet their reporters are still kept out
published on
countries
sources
articles
the same fact, two accounts
this subject is more divergent than 27% of the subjects analysed
GermanyBerlin is watching the battle for press freedom unfolding in Washington, where more than 50 media outlets and professional associations have taken a stance in court alongside CNN, MS NOW and Politico, which have been excluded by Donald Trump.
What each one tells
opposition
FranceParis is measuring the gap between the court order that restored CNN, MS NOW and Politico's access to the White House and its non-application, just a few hours later, on the ground.
- Germany
of press freedom
the narrative directly describes the exclusion as an "attack on press freedom" rather than a mere procedural dispute.
Omission of the White House's position
the articles report the versions of the concerned editorial offices but note the lack of official reaction from the US executive.
Emphasis on professional mobilization
the coverage highlights the number of signatories who came to support the excluded media.
What the account puts first
Franceof the paradox
French articles emphasize the gap between the order and the refusal of access observed on the same day, more than the substance of the judicial procedure.
Omission of specific accusations
the French press reports that Donald Trump accuses the media of false information without detailing the elements put forward by the administration.
- Germany
this perspective does not carry this information
What it leans on
France onlyFranceReliance on a news agency dispatch
several reports repeat the same decision consulted by AFP without citing any other independent primary source.
and the figures
this press does not report this figure
Chains suspending the pool
number of channels
only one reports itFour major American networks, CBS, ABC, NBC and Fox