A judge orders the White House to restore access for CNN, MS NOW and Politico, yet their reporters are still kept out
published on
countries
sources
articles
the same fact, two accounts
this subject is more divergent than 27% of the subjects analysed
GreeceAthens sees in this ruling a victory for the First Amendment over the logic of retaliation, opposed to three drafts rejected for their critical coverage of the Trump administration.
What each one tells
opposition
FranceParis is measuring the gap between the court order that restored CNN, MS NOW and Politico's access to the White House and its non-application, just a few hours later, on the ground.
- Greece
of the political duel
the narrative highlights the confrontation between Trump and the media rather than the details of the judicial procedure.
What the account puts first
Franceof the paradox
French articles emphasize the gap between the order and the refusal of access observed on the same day, more than the substance of the judicial procedure.
Omission of specific accusations
the French press reports that Donald Trump accuses the media of false information without detailing the elements put forward by the administration.
- Greece
Reliance on the version of the plaintiff newsrooms
the narrative reuses the terms of their complaint without citing equivalent arguments from the White House.
What it leans on
FranceReliance on a news agency dispatch
several reports repeat the same decision consulted by AFP without citing any other independent primary source.
and the figures
this press does not report this figure
Chains suspending the pool
number of channels
only one reports itFour major American networks, CBS, ABC, NBC and Fox