The Justice Department defends the barring of CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House in court
published on
countries
sources
articles
the same fact, two accounts
United KingdomLondon breaks down hour by hour the mechanics of the banishment of CNN, Politico and MS NOW by Donald Trump, between collective suspension of the television pool and chaotic launch of "Trump TV".
What each one tells
opposition
SwedenStockholm is examining the security argument cited by the Ministry of Justice to justify the exclusion of CNN, MS NOW and Politico, as a federal judge is set to rule on the matter this Wednesday.
- United Kingdom
Institutional
the narrative focuses the conflict on the mechanics of the press pool rather than on the legal arguments of the two sides.
Omission of the government's defense
the position of the banned media on the unconstitutionality of the measure is reported, without the administration's counterargument.
Emphasis on criticism
comparisons to the state television outnumber the official quote defending the channel.
What the account puts first
SwedenCiting American sources
the narrative relies on information reported by CNN and the New York Times, without independent Swedish reporting on the ground.
Omission of direct quote
the text attributes to Trump the accusation of fake news without reproducing his exact words, only reported indirectly.