Seven weeks from the midterms, the Supreme Court rejects Trump's mail-in voting restrictions
the same fact, two accounts
this subject is more divergent than 95% of the subjects analysed
United KingdomLondon takes from this judicial setback a confirmation of the American institutional checks, seven weeks before a tense election.
What each one tells
opposition
AustraliaCanberra is particularly taking note of Donald Trump's unprecedented attack on his own Supreme Court, more so than the legal details of the ruling that blocks his restrictions on mail-in voting.
- United Kingdom
centered on Trump's reaction
the narrative devotes considerable space to the president's anger rather than the legal content of the decision.
What the account puts first
Australiafocused on the presidential reaction
the narrative devotes most of the space to Donald Trump's statement rather than the Court's reasoning.
Omission of the dissenting motives
the articles name the two dissenting judges without developing their motives.
- United Kingdom
Reliance on the opinions of judges
the narrative reiterates the Court's version through the writings of Kavanaugh, Alito, and Thomas, without detailing who brought the appeal to the court.
What it leans on
AustraliaReliance on the executive's statement
the defense of the presidential attack by the Attorney General occupies a notable place in the narrative.
and the figures
this press does not report this figure
Vote count of judges
majority votes out of 9
this press does not report this figure
around 30 % of voters
Share of mail-in votes
% of voters
only one reports itthis press does not report this figure