TRUMP SAYS HE WON'T RUSH A DEAL WITH IRANCOMPARATIVE VIEW
EXPLORE THIS STORY
SHARE THIS COMPARISON
Show your friends how the world sees the same news differently.
On May 24, 2026, Donald Trump tempered deal expectations, saying he had told his negotiators not to 'rush' despite signs of progress toward ending the U.S.-Iran war, with a ceasefire holding since April. Six national readings weigh the volatility of Trump's diplomacy.
🇶🇦 Qatar vs 🇸🇬 Singapore
FRAMING GAP
86/100HIGH
Perspectives diverge strongly
Here are the main framing differences identified between media coverages.
ANALYSIS BY COUNTRY
QATARSTATEDOMINANT ANGLE
Doha closely tracks Washington's whiplash on Iran negotiations: a deal announced as "largely negotiated" one day, then tempered by Trump himself the next, places Qatar—a directly consulted mediator—at the center of diplomatic volatility.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani appears on the list of Gulf leaders Trump called to discuss US-Iran negotiation progress.
- •On May 24, Trump announced a deal "largely negotiated" with Iran, then stated the next day that "time is on our side," maintaining the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz "in full force and effect."
- •Iran's Tasnim agency indicates the Strait of Hormuz could reopen within thirty days of an accord, but says Washington still blocks release of Tehran's frozen assets.
BIASES
Gulf-centric framing: Al Jazeera's coverage emphasizes Gulf nations as moderating actors who secured U.S. suspension of Iran strikes, implicitly validating regional diplomacy.Preference for negotiated path: editorial treatment consistently highlights positive signals (deal "largely negotiated," Trump phone calls) before addressing blockage points, reflecting bias favoring de-escalation.Limited direct Iranian positions: Tehran's official responses are sparse; Tasnim agency (linked to the Revolutionary Guards) is the primary Iranian source cited, constraining representation of Iran's governmental stance.
SINGAPOREDOMINANT ANGLE
Singapore tracks with precision the economic risks of a conflict that paralyzes the Strait of Hormuz, scrutinizing every diplomatic signal between Washington and Tehran.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Before the conflict, the Strait of Hormuz ensured the transit of one-fifth of global petroleum and liquefied natural gas shipments.
- •Trump declared on May 24 that he had instructed his negotiators to 'not rush,' while maintaining the blockade of Iranian ports.
- •US strikes on missile sites in southern Iran occurred on May 25 despite the presence of Iranian negotiators in Doha.
BIASES
Economics-centered framing: Straits Times coverage systematically prioritizes energy supply security concerns and maritime commercial disruptions.Preference for official diplomatic signals: analysis relies on Trump and Rubio statements, according less weight to internal Iranian positions.Limited coverage of Israeli dynamics: Israel's role in triggering the conflict and its ongoing operations in Lebanon remain underdeveloped in articles.
QATARSTATEDOMINANT ANGLE
Doha closely tracks Washington's whiplash on Iran negotiations: a deal announced as "largely negotiated" one day, then tempered by Trump himself the next, places Qatar—a directly consulted mediator—at the center of diplomatic volatility.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Qatari Prime Minister Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani appears on the list of Gulf leaders Trump called to discuss US-Iran negotiation progress.
- •On May 24, Trump announced a deal "largely negotiated" with Iran, then stated the next day that "time is on our side," maintaining the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz "in full force and effect."
- •Iran's Tasnim agency indicates the Strait of Hormuz could reopen within thirty days of an accord, but says Washington still blocks release of Tehran's frozen assets.
BIASES
Gulf-centric framing: Al Jazeera's coverage emphasizes Gulf nations as moderating actors who secured U.S. suspension of Iran strikes, implicitly validating regional diplomacy.Preference for negotiated path: editorial treatment consistently highlights positive signals (deal "largely negotiated," Trump phone calls) before addressing blockage points, reflecting bias favoring de-escalation.Limited direct Iranian positions: Tehran's official responses are sparse; Tasnim agency (linked to the Revolutionary Guards) is the primary Iranian source cited, constraining representation of Iran's governmental stance.
SINGAPOREDOMINANT ANGLE
Singapore tracks with precision the economic risks of a conflict that paralyzes the Strait of Hormuz, scrutinizing every diplomatic signal between Washington and Tehran.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- •Before the conflict, the Strait of Hormuz ensured the transit of one-fifth of global petroleum and liquefied natural gas shipments.
- •Trump declared on May 24 that he had instructed his negotiators to 'not rush,' while maintaining the blockade of Iranian ports.
- •US strikes on missile sites in southern Iran occurred on May 25 despite the presence of Iranian negotiators in Doha.
BIASES
Economics-centered framing: Straits Times coverage systematically prioritizes energy supply security concerns and maritime commercial disruptions.Preference for official diplomatic signals: analysis relies on Trump and Rubio statements, according less weight to internal Iranian positions.Limited coverage of Israeli dynamics: Israel's role in triggering the conflict and its ongoing operations in Lebanon remain underdeveloped in articles.
AI-generated content — Analyses are produced by artificial intelligence from press articles. They may contain errors or biases. Learn more