
published on
countries
sources
articles
this subject is more divergent than 58% of the subjects analysed
United Kingdom
London is measuring the diplomatic consequences of the UN report, between the military dilemma of Trump and the granting of Iranian visas in the midst of war.
What each one tells
Canada
Ottawa is first examining the legal qualification of the UN report, which classifies the two American strikes in February as war crimes and the Iranian repression as crimes against humanity.
United Kingdom
centered on Trump's dilemma
the coverage highlights his quote about a "big decision" rather than the human toll of the strikes.
What the account puts first
Canada
Omission of the Canadian voice
the account cites consistent US and Iranian positions but no reaction from the federal government to the report's conclusions.
United Kingdom
the Iranian reaction
no official reaction from Tehran to the new report is reported, only a reminder of its previous positions.
What it leaves out
Canada
this perspective does not carry this information
United Kingdom
Reliance on the official American source
the questioning of the report's credibility is based on a statement by a State Department official.
What it leans on
Canada
Near-exclusive reliance on the Reuters dispatch
the two versions consulted reproduce almost verbatim the same agency account, with no distinct Canadian reporting from the field.
and the figures
at least 156 dead, including 120 children
Assessment of the strike on Minab school
people killed
more than 150 people, including around 120 schoolchildren
this press does not report this figure
Children killed in the crackdown
children killed
this press does not report this figure
22 civilians killed or injured
Assessment of the strike on Lamerd
civilians killed or injured
this press does not report this figure