DOMINANT ANGLE
Stockholm notes that the boycott of American channels goes beyond partisan divisions, even including Fox News, a channel close to Trump.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
KEY POINTS
- 01
CNN, Politico, and MS Now have filed a complaint against Donald Trump, seeking a federal judge to revoke his ban on their access to the White House (Sveriges Radio).
- 02
Journalists from the three groups were denied entry to the White House on Saturday, September 19, despite having valid accreditation (Sveriges Radio).
- 03
Fox News announced that its teams would no longer follow presidential trips as long as the ban decision remained in effect, joining the boycott (Dagens Nyheter).
ANALYSIS
Stockholm, September 22, 2026. The Swedish press is following the unprecedented confrontation between major American media outlets and the White House, focusing on two distinct fronts: the judicial route and a professional solidarity that transcends usual political divides.
Sveriges Radio reports that CNN, Politico, and MS Now have filed a complaint against Donald Trump after the president ordered their ban from the White House on Friday, September 18. According to the public radio station, despite valid accreditation, journalists from the three companies were refused entry on Saturday, September 19. The three groups, in their joint complaint cited by Sveriges Radio, describe the presidential decision as a "direct attack on the Constitution." They are asking a federal judge to revoke the measure taken by Trump.
But it is especially the article by Dagens Nyheter that has caught the attention of the Swedish editorial team: the boycott of presidential trips by television teams is not limited to the media outlets targeted by the ban. Fox News, a channel notoriously close to Trump, has announced that it is joining the movement. The head of the channel's Washington bureau wrote that his teams would no longer cover the president's travels as long as the decision remains in effect. DN describes this gesture as "unexpected help" from a usual editorial ally of the White House.
For the Swedish press, this rallying of Fox News changes the scope of the conflict: it is no longer a dispute between the Trump administration and editorial teams deemed hostile, but a professional principle - the access of accredited journalists - that even channels favorable to the president consider threatened. Stockholm sees this as a signal that the red line goes beyond the usual partisan sympathies of the American media landscape.
Neither of the two Swedish articles details the arguments put forward by the White House or by JD Vance to justify the exclusion, nor do they mention the launch of "Trump TV": the angle retained here remains focused on the reaction of the media itself, rather than on the version of the American executive.
