EXPLORE THIS STORY
WASHINGTON BOMBS IRAN'S WATER RESERVOIRS AND THREATENS BRIDGES AND POWER PLANTS AS THE DEAL COLLAPSES
Moscow calls the IAEA resolution a 'farce' and deems the civilian strikes 'categorically unacceptable'
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
Moscow positions itself as Tehran's advocate on two fronts at once. Diplomatically, in Vienna, Russia, China and Niger voted against the IAEA resolution demanding that Iran cooperate and grant access to its nuclear sites — a text adopted anyway by 21 votes. Russian envoy Mikhail Ulyanov denounced a document that is merely 'a farce,' accusing Washington of 'shifting responsibility for the problems caused by the aggressor onto the victim of that aggression.' Militarily, foreign-ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said she was 'extremely concerned about the new round of US-Iranian armed conflict, which began with the unprovoked US-Israeli aggression against Iran,' and called strikes on civilian infrastructure 'categorically inadmissible.' Pro-Kremlin analysts spin another thread: Iran's 'trump card' against its enemies is supposedly 'popular support' for its government, and Washington 'has the power to stop Israel' but declines to use it. On state channels the tone is sharper: RT runs Trump's line — 'the Bully of the Middle East is dead' — as evidence of an America that talks big but is bogging down. For Moscow, every day of war in the Gulf pulls the spotlight away from Ukraine, rattles an oil market to the benefit of its own barrels, and reinforces its thesis of a West acting outside international law.
Aligns its reading with the defense of Tehran
Reverses the charge by casting Washington as the aggressor
Puts the escalation in the service of its Ukraine thesis
AI-generated content — Analyses are produced by artificial intelligence from press articles. They may contain errors or biases. Learn more
Discover how another country covers this same story.