EXPLORE THIS STORY
SHADOW DIPLOMACY: CHINA AND PAKISTAN PURSUE PEACE WHILE BOMBS FALL ON IRAN
AI-generated content — Analyses are produced by artificial intelligence from press articles. They may contain errors or biases. Learn more
Pakistan positions itself as mediator to avoid choosing between Beijing and Washington
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
Pakistan plays the boldest card in its recent diplomacy: positioning itself as mediator between Washington and Tehran. Pakistani Ambassador to the United States Rizwan Saeed Sheikh states in Dawn: 'Diplomacy takes time.' A phrase that reveals much—Islamabad knows that no one truly believes in rapid mediation, but simply offering it is already a gain.
The same day, Dawn reports a joint Pakistan-China five-point initiative: immediate cessation of hostilities, opening of peace talks 'as soon as possible,' protection of civilians, respect for Iranian sovereignty, and security of the Strait of Hormuz. The initiative is constructed so no one can publicly oppose it—and that is exactly the trap. If Washington rejects it, Islamabad can say: 'We tried.'
The Toronto Globe and Mail captures the Pakistani dilemma perfectly: Islamabad 'walks a tightrope' between China and the United States. Pakistan depends on the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (62 billion dollars in Chinese investments) but also on American military aid. Positioning itself as mediator allows it to avoid choosing. This is calculation, not altruism.
What Dawn does not say is that Pakistan shares 900 kilometers of border with Iran. Every missile that falls on the other side generates refugee flows, fuel smuggling, and instability in Balochistan—the country's most volatile province.
The Pakistani military is invisible in media narrative despite orchestrating foreign policy
The CPEC corridor presented as partnership rather than growing dependence on Beijing
Silence on Iranian fuel smuggling that funds militias in Balochistan