PAKISTAN PERSPECTIVE

The Pakistani media coverage reveals a complex geopolitical approach marked by a strategic positioning between different regional powers. The dominant emphasis is on the economic and security consequences of the conflict, with particular attention to global energy disruptions and their impact on developing countries. Pakistani media adopts predominantly an alarmist tone (-0.6 on average), highlighting 'tragic consequences' and a 'global oil crisis', while presenting the conflict as an uncontrollable escalation threatening regional stability.

A striking aspect of this coverage is the emphasis on Iranian military capabilities, notably the claim to have hit an American F-35, presented as a 'historic feat'. This focus on Iranian defensive successes contrasts with relative silence about civilian Iranian losses or details of the initial US-Israeli strikes. Pakistani media favor a narrative where Iran appears in a legitimate defensive position, responding to external aggression.

The narrative framing reveals significant structural biases linked to Pakistan's geostrategic interests. The firm official reaction against statements by the Israeli ambassador to India illustrates sensitivity towards allusions concerning Pakistan’s nuclear program and alliances with Gulf countries. This vigorous diplomatic defense ('baseless characterization') reflects a major concern about how Pakistan is perceived internationally as a 'rogue state'.

The analysis of silences is revealing: near-total absence of direct criticism toward Iran, minimization of Saudi Arabia's role in the conflict despite a defense pact with Pakistan, and limited focus on implications for Pakistan-US relations. Pakistani media construct a narrative where Pakistan appears as a responsible actor advocating stability while carefully avoiding taking an explicit position between its different strategic partners. This approach reflects traditional Pakistani balancing diplomacy in an increasingly polarized geopolitical context.