EXPLORE THIS STORY
TRUMP HITS AUSTRALIA WITH 12.5% TARIFF OVER 'FORCED LABOUR'
Berlin views this wave of tariffs as a sign of a new legal basis - forced labor - intended to succeed the customs duties invalidated by the Supreme Court, rather than as a measure targeting Australia alone.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
Berlin, July 24, 2026. Deciphered by the German economic press, the new tariff salvo announced by the US does not target Australia alone: it strikes 60 trade partners, including the European Union, Switzerland, Japan, and Taiwan, in addition to Canberra, with tariffs ranging from 10 to 12.5%. The Handelsblatt and FAZ highlight that these taxes are based on Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, a provision previously used by Trump against China during his first term and confirmed by the courts. The stated reason is that these countries have not sufficiently combated imports of goods made with forced labor.
According to the German press, the announcement fits into a precise timeline. After his defeat in February before the Supreme Court, which had invalidated his broadest tariffs based on a 1977 emergency law (IEEPA), Trump had imposed provisional 10% tariffs via Section 122, legally capped at 150 days and 15% maximum. This clause expires Friday at midnight US time — 6:01 AM German time — forcing the White House to replace it with a new approach, this time under the guise of combating forced labor. The office of US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer notes that the affected partners account for more than 99% of US imports.
The Handelsblatt notes that exemptions exist for goods already loaded onto a ship, in the final stage of transport, and cleared before July 28. The FAZ recalls that the US has already reimbursed over $70 billion to companies since spring as part of the dismantling of tariffs invalidated by the courts.
While German media primarily document the impact on the EU, which is included on this list alongside Australia, ZEIT Online describes the move as a "power play" as much as an industrial policy, seeing it as less of a legal "rebranding" and more of a new escalation loop in Trump's tariff universe.
EU-centered framing: the German press primarily documents the impact on the European Union, with Australia only mentioned as one of the sixty affected partners.
Preference for legal analysis: the articles extensively detail the successive legal bases (IEEPA, paragraph 122, paragraph 301) rather than Australia's diplomatic reactions.
Low coverage of Australian exporters: exemption requests made by Canberra are not reported in the consulted German sources.
Discover how another country covers this same story.