EXPLORE THIS STORY
TRUMP HITS AUSTRALIA WITH 12.5% TARIFF OVER 'FORCED LABOUR'
The United States claims the measure as the most ambitious action ever taken against forced labor, refusing to see it as a hostile gesture towards a close ally like Australia.
Dominant angle identified — does not reflect unanimity of this country’s media
The United States government has imposed a new wave of tariffs, ranging from 10% to 12.5%, on 60 trade partners in an effort to combat forced labor, according to a notice published in the Federal Register. Effective at 12:01 a.m. Eastern Time on Friday, these measures replace the global temporary tariffs of 10% instituted by the Trump administration, which were set to expire at the same time. The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) claims that the measure covers 99.4% of US foreign trade, but cannot quantify the expected revenue.
A senior administration official described the decision to journalists as "the most ambitious action ever taken on international labor rights, by the United States or any other country." The official clarified that these new tariffs will not be added to the existing "Section 232" tariffs on steel and aluminum.
The move is based on an investigation under Section 301 of the 1974 Trade Act, launched in March by US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, aiming to determine whether trade partners were failing to effectively block goods made with forced labor. The USTR concluded in June that these shortcomings unfairly penalized American trade. Countries found to have banned forced labor but without effective enforcement will face a 10% tariff, while others, including Australia, will face 12.5%. India received the reduced rate after adopting new measures since June, which the administration sees as proof that a country can improve its treatment. Oil, gas, certain fertilizers, and food products are exempt.
This announcement comes in a busy week for the Trump administration's trade agenda, with 25% tariffs imposed on Brazil and 50% tariffs announced against Canada. It also marks the White House's search for a more durable legal foundation, after the Supreme Court earlier this year limited the use of the IEEPA law to justify unilateral tariffs.
The United States government's perspective is presented through official administration channels, including the USTR and anonymous officials, without direct reaction from the targeted partners.
The US media focuses on the legal and macroeconomic framing, such as Section 301 and the portion of trade covered, at the expense of the concrete impact on the US-Australia alliance or AUKUS.
There is limited coverage of the Australian reaction, with no Australian officials or exporters quoted in the available articles requesting an exemption.
Discover how another country covers this same story.